
Jordan A. Cafritz
Senior Associate
Practice: Corporate Governance, Mergers & Acquisitions
About Jordan A. Cafritz
Jordan Cafritz is a Senior Associate with the Firm’s Washington, D.C. office. While attending law school at American University he was an active member of the American University Business Law Review and worked as a Rule 16 attorney in the Criminal Justice Defense Clinic. After graduating from law school, Mr. Cafritz clerked for the Honorable Paul W. Grimm in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.
Education
- American University Washington College of Law, J.D. (2014)
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, B.A. (2010) Economics & History
Admissions
- Maryland (2014)
- District of Columbia (2018)
Notable Cases
In Karsan Value Fund v. Kostecki Brokerage Pty, Ltd. et al., C.A. No. 2021-0899-LWW (Delaware Chancery), Mr. Cafritz played a lead role in securing a $9.5 million common fund for the minority stockholders in connection with a controller buyout – a $1.90 per share (75%) increase on top of the original merger consideration of $2.55 per share.
In Jacobs v. Meghji, et al., C.A. No. 2019-1022-MTZ (Delaware Chancery), Mr. Cafritz played a lead role in challenging a series of unfair equity transactions imposed on Infrastructure Energy Alternatives Inc. The resulting settlement led to the issuance of new preferred stock that fundamentally revised the capital structure of the company and paved the way for a $1.1bn acquisition of the company.
In Teuza – A Fairchild Technology Venture, Ltd., et al. v. Lindon, et al., C.A. No. 2022-0130-BWD (Delaware Chancery), Mr. Cafritz played a lead role in challenging the 2021 sale of Bioness, Inc. to Bioventus, in which the company's controlling stockholders were alleged to have steered the sale process to benefit themselves at the expense of the minority shareholders. The resulting settlement provided an $8.9 million all-cash common fund for the minority shareholders, with the Court of Chancery finding counsel "experienced and well qualified" and recognizing the "excellent representation” that the class received.
Articles

Delaware Narrows Shareholder Inspection Rights: A Closer Look at the Changes to Section 220 of the DGCL
On March 26, 2025, Delaware Governor Matt Meyer signed Senate Bill 21 (SB 21), significantly amending (among other thing…

Delaware Supreme Court’s Match.com decision clarifies a key aspect of Delaware law, potentially preventing dismissals of well-founded lawsuits where all special committee members are not independent and reinforces the Delaware Court’s inclination towards enhanced scrutiny for controller led transactions
Summary: In April 2024, in an eagerly anticipated decision, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an order in In re Match…

The SEC, AI Disclosures, and a New Wave of Securities Litigation
Artificial intelligence has rapidly become a defining feature of corporate strategy. Public companies now routinely desc…