First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) Securities Class Action Lawsuit Update

• Company: First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR)
• Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 24, 2026
• Class Period: February 26, 2025 - February 24, 2026
• Stock Drop: January 7, 2026 - FSLR fell $27.67 (10.29%) to $241.11; February 25, 2026 - FSLR fell $33.09 (13.61%) to $210.12

Introduction

On June 23, 2026, a federal securities class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR), its Chief Executive Officer Mark R. Widmar, and its Chief Financial Officer Alexander R. Bradley. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of all investors who purchased or acquired First Solar securities between February 26, 2025 and February 24, 2026, asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

At the heart of the complaint is a solar manufacturing giant that told Wall Street it could weather a historic tariff storm, even turn it into a competitive advantage. As the Trump administration rolled out sweeping reciprocal tariffs on imports from Malaysia and Vietnam, countries where First Solar operated major production facilities, the company's leadership repeatedly assured investors that the trade environment was "long term favorable" and had "strengthened" First Solar's position in the industry. Executives characterized the deliberate idling of Southeast Asian factories as a strategic pause, preserving "optionality" while they awaited clarity. They touted plans for a new U.S. finishing facility as a way to boost margins and reduce tariff exposure. The complaint alleges these assurances helped keep FSLR securities trading at artificially inflated prices.

The cracks appeared on January 7, 2026, when Jefferies downgraded FSLR to Hold, flagging that international facilities "remain a pain point while tariffs exist" and warning that deployment opportunities would shrink in 2026. The stock dropped $27.67 per share, or 10.29%, in a single session. Then came the full reckoning. On February 24, 2026, First Solar reported fourth quarter and full-year 2025 results that missed expectations by a wide margin and issued 2026 revenue guidance of $4.9 billion to $5.2 billion, far below the $6.16 billion consensus estimate. The company disclosed that its Southeast Asian factories were running at approximately 20% utilization and acknowledged significant underutilization and cost headwinds; analysts also cited operational challenges, including tariffs, relocating production to the U.S., and Southeast Asia underutilization. The following day, FSLR plunged another $33.09 per share, or 13.61%, to close at $210.12. Multiple analysts slashed price targets and downgraded the stock, citing a "weak FY26 guidance" that suggested "cooling demand and operational challenges."

Backdrop and Business Context

First Solar traces its origins to Toledo, Ohio, where the glass-making expertise of the Midwest incubated a new approach to solar energy. The company's predecessor, Solar Cells, Inc., was founded in 1990 by inventor Harold McMaster. In 1999, True North Partners, LLC acquired the business and rebranded it as First Solar, Inc., backed by an early investment of approximately $150 million from John Walton. First Solar's IPO priced on November 17, 2006 at $20 per share; the offering included shares sold by the company and selling stockholders. From the start, First Solar's defining strategic thread has been its proprietary cadmium telluride thin-film photovoltaic technology, a differentiated alternative to the crystalline silicon panels that dominate the global market.

First Solar designs, manufactures, and sells CdTe thin-film solar modules primarily for utility-scale power generation. Revenue comes overwhelmingly from module sales under long-term supply agreements with project developers, utilities, and independent power producers. For full-year 2025, the company reported net sales of approximately $5.2 billion, up from $4.2 billion in 2024, driven by a 24% increase in third-party module volume. First Solar describes itself as the world's largest thin-film PV solar module manufacturer and the only U.S.-headquartered company among the world's largest solar manufacturers. Its primary competitors in the broader utility-scale segment include Chinese crystalline-silicon giants such as JinkoSolar and Canadian Solar, against which First Solar differentiates on technology, domestic manufacturing footprint, and energy yield in high-temperature environments.

First Solar's manufacturing network spans the United States, India, Malaysia, and Vietnam, with a target of approximately 25 gigawatts of global annual nameplate capacity by 2026. Its Southeast Asian facilities in Kulim, Malaysia, and Dong Nam, Vietnam, account for roughly 5.5 gigawatts of that capacity. According to the complaint, this international production base became a critical vulnerability when the Trump administration imposed sweeping reciprocal tariffs on imports from those countries. The lawsuit alleges that defendants overstated First Solar's ability to manage the tariff impact and understated the extent to which deliberate facility underutilization and the attempted relocation of production to the U.S. would damage the company's projected performance in fiscal year 2026.

Promises Made vs. Reality

From the opening day of the class period, First Solar's leadership painted a picture of resilience. During the fiscal year 2024 earnings call on February 25, 2025, CEO Mark Widmar framed the macro environment as one that demanded solar energy, telling investors that President Trump's economic mandate "could reshape the US economy" and that "the country cannot wait that long" for nuclear or natural gas alternatives. Solar, Widmar emphasized, "should clearly be a significant part of the near-term solution mix." CFO Alexander Bradley acknowledged that the company was in an "under-allocation position" for its Series 6 production in Malaysia and Vietnam, but reassured shareholders that First Solar's "module sale contracts for international product deliveries typically have some form of tariff protection."

When the tariff hammer fell on April 2, 2025, with reciprocal rates of 24% on Malaysia and 46% on Vietnam, the tone shifted only slightly. On the first quarter earnings call that month, Widmar conceded "significant near term uncertainty" but declared that "on balance, the political and trade environment continues to be an overall long term favorable." He acknowledged the company "may not be in a position to utilize our currently available international production capacity" and might "need to further reduce or idle production at one or both of these locations," yet insisted that "the long-term outlook for solar demand, particularly in our core U.S. market remains strong." By the second quarter call on July 31, 2025, Widmar went further, claiming the policy landscape had "strengthened First Solar's relative position in the solar manufacturing industry." He characterized the underutilization of Malaysian and Vietnamese factories as a positive, explaining that idle equipment could be repurposed domestically to "take advantage of the manufacturing tax credit environment."

Throughout the second half of 2025, executives continued to frame Southeast Asian underutilization and potential idling as temporary and strategically sound. On the third quarter earnings call in October 2025, Widmar announced a new U.S. finishing facility, stating it would "improve the gross margin profile of our sales by reducing tariff charges." Bradley described the decision as one of three updates driving revised guidance but noted that the company would "continue to evaluate options for our remaining Malaysia and Vietnam facilities," excluding "any additional costs associated with potential restructuring charges or asset impairments" from guidance. When analysts pressed on what conclusion investors should draw about underutilization in the following year, Widmar claimed the company was "in negotiations with a couple of counterparties" for offtake volume, adding that he "would like to find potentially a couple of large customers." On November 14, 2025, Widmar stated that the new South Carolina facility would "allow us to serve the US market with technology that is compliant with the Act's stringent provisions, within timelines that align with our customers' objectives." As late as February 23, 2026, one day before the February 24, 2026 earnings release and 2026 guidance, Widmar was quoted in a press release asserting that First Solar could "deliver long-term economic value."

According to the complaint, later disclosures told a starkly different story. On January 7, 2026, Jefferies downgraded the stock, warning that international facilities "remain a pain point" and that deployment opportunities would be "more limited in 2026." Then, on February 24, 2026, First Solar reported revenue guidance for fiscal year 2026 of $4.9 billion to $5.2 billion, roughly 17% below the Street consensus of $6.16 billion. Executives disclosed that Southeast Asian facilities would remain at low utilization rates, and Widmar stated those factories were running at approximately 20% utilization. Widmar acknowledged on the call that First Solar had been "wearing this for over a year now" and was incurring "significant underutilization and cost headwinds." Multiple analysts downgraded the stock; Baird cited "several question marks in forward outlook," HSBC attributed the weak guidance to "less bullish US solar demand" and "operational challenges, including US tariffs, relocating production back to the US along with underutilization in Southeast Asia," and Deutsche Bank noted the disappointing results were driven by underutilization costs and lower-margin Indian production. As alleged in the complaint, defendants had consistently overstated First Solar's capacity to manage the tariff environment and understated the degree to which facility idling and production relocation would erode projected 2026 performance, rendering their public statements throughout the class period materially false and misleading.

Timeline of Alleged Misconduct and Disclosures

Class Period: February 26, 2025 - February 24, 2026, inclusive.

• February 25, 2025: First Solar files its Form 10-K for fiscal year 2024, issues a press release, and holds the FY 2024 Earnings Call. CEO Widmar frames solar as essential to the Trump administration's energy agenda. CFO Bradley discusses "oversold" U.S. production and "under-allocation" in Malaysia and Vietnam, and assures investors of contractual tariff protections for international deliveries.

February 26, 2025: Class period begins.

April 2, 2025: President Trump announces reciprocal tariffs, including 24% on Malaysia and 46% on Vietnam. Rates are subsequently reduced to 10%.

April 29, 2025: First Solar files its Q1 2025 Form 10-Q and holds the Q1 Earnings Call. Widmar states the trade environment is "an overall long term favorable." He acknowledges First Solar may need to "further reduce or idle production" in Malaysia and Vietnam but maintains long-term optimism. Bradley announces updated guidance incorporating reduced capacity utilization at Southeast Asian facilities, characterizing idling as preserving "optionality."

July 31, 2025: First Solar files its Q2 2025 Form 10-Q and holds the Q2 Earnings Call. Widmar claims trade developments have "strengthened First Solar's relative position in the solar manufacturing industry." Bradley announces revised guidance incorporating 25% Malaysia and 20% Vietnam tariffs. Widmar characterizes underutilization as a positive, noting idle tools could be repurposed domestically.

October 30, 2025: First Solar files its Q3 2025 Form 10-Q and holds the Q3 Earnings Call. Widmar discloses reduced production in Malaysia and Vietnam and the termination of 6.6 gigawatts of bookings following BP affiliate defaults. Defendants announce a new U.S. finishing facility, later identified on November 14, 2025 as being located in South Carolina, expected to commence operations in the second half of 2026. Bradley states guidance excludes potential restructuring charges or asset impairments from remaining Malaysia and Vietnam facilities.

November 14, 2025: First Solar announces the South Carolina facility location, with Widmar touting its ability to serve U.S. customers under new trade policies.

January 7, 2026: Alleged Corrective Disclosure. Jefferies downgrades First Solar to Hold from Buy, citing lowered guidance, significant de-bookings, margin compression, and warning that international facilities "remain a pain point while tariffs exist" and that 2026 deployment opportunities would be more limited. FSLR falls $27.67 per share (10.29%) to close at $241.11.

February 23, 2026: First Solar issues a press release touting an economic impact study projecting increased U.S. jobs and GDP contributions. Widmar states the company can "deliver long-term economic value."

February 24, 2026: Alleged Corrective Disclosure. First Solar announces Q4 and full-year 2025 financial results, reporting earnings that miss expectations by a wide margin and issuing FY 2026 revenue guidance of $4.9 billion to $5.2 billion, well below the $6.16 billion consensus. Executives disclose that Southeast Asian facilities would remain at low utilization rates, and Widmar states those factories are running at approximately 20% utilization. Widmar acknowledges significant underutilization cost headwinds persisting "for over a year." FSLR falls $33.09 per share (13.61%) to close at $210.12 on February 25, 2026. Multiple analysts downgrade the stock and slash price targets.

Investor Harm and Market Reaction

The first alleged corrective disclosure landed on January 7, 2026, when Jefferies' downgrade revealed concerns that, according to the complaint, undermined defendants' prior assurances that the tariff environment was manageable or favorable. FSLR shares plummeted $27.67, or 10.29%, to close at $241.11 in a single trading session. Jefferies warned that international facility underutilization "remains a concern" and predicted more limited deployment opportunities in 2026, which the complaint alleges undermined defendants’ prior assurances that the tariff environment was manageable or favorable.

The damage deepened dramatically on February 25, 2026, the first full trading day after First Solar's disappointing fourth quarter report and fiscal year 2026 guidance. FSLR cratered another $33.09, or 13.61%, to close at $210.12. The 2026 revenue guidance of $4.9 billion to $5.2 billion came in roughly 17% below the $6.16 billion consensus estimate, which the complaint alleges was inconsistent with defendants' prior assurances that tariff-driven disruptions were manageable or advantageous. Analyst reactions were swift and severe: Baird downgraded the stock to Neutral from Outperform and cut its price target approximately 22.3%, from $264 to $205. HSBC downgraded from Buy to Hold and slashed its target 24.6%, from $280 to $211. Deutsche Bank lowered its target approximately 18.3%, from $300 to $245. Jefferies reduced its target approximately 21%, from $260 to $205, noting that the guidance "disappointed even versus (lower) reset expectations, with limited visibility on recovery."

Taken together, the two alleged corrective disclosures coincided with declines totaling more than $60 per share over a period of less than two months. The complaint alleges that investors who purchased or acquired FSLR securities during the class period suffered losses when the alleged corrective disclosures revealed the scope of operational challenges and the 2026 outlook.

Litigation & Procedural Posture

The complaint asserts claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against all defendants, and under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the Individual Defendants as controlling persons of First Solar. The named defendants are First Solar, Inc., Mark R. Widmar (Chief Executive Officer), and Alexander R. Bradley (Chief Financial Officer). Scienter allegations center on the Individual Defendants' positions at the apex of First Solar's management hierarchy, which gave them direct access to information about international facility utilization, tariff exposure, customer negotiations, and the financial modeling underlying the company's forward guidance. The complaint further alleges that both defendants enriched themselves through insider stock sales during the class period, with Widmar selling 87,130 shares for approximately $14.1 million in proceeds and Bradley selling 19,663 shares for over $2.9 million, totaling 106,793 shares and more than $17.1 million combined. Procedurally, the case was filed on June 23, 2026, and assigned Case No. 1:26-cv-03787 in the Eastern District of New York. The complaint seeks class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) on behalf of all persons who purchased or acquired First Solar securities during the class period and were damaged by the alleged corrective disclosures. Lead plaintiff submissions are due August 24, 2026. The complaint invokes the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance, noting that FSLR traded on an efficient market on the NASDAQ with coverage by multiple analysts and over 107 million shares outstanding.

SEC Filings & Risk Factors

The complaint targets a series of periodic SEC filings made by First Solar during the class period, alleging that each failed to adequately disclose material risks related to U.S. tariff policy and the company's operational responses to that policy. First Solar's Form 10-K for fiscal year 2024, filed on February 25, 2025, set the baseline. The filing and accompanying earnings call acknowledged an "uncertain U.S. policy environment following the 2024 U.S. elections" and a "supply and demand imbalance for Southeast Asian product," but reassured investors that the U.S. market enjoyed stable module prices and that international sales contracts "typically have some form of tariff protection." The complaint alleges these disclosures were materially inadequate because they framed tariff risk in hypothetical terms while defendants knew or recklessly disregarded the degree to which tariff-driven underutilization could persist and damage forward performance. The Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2025, filed April 29, 2025, updated guidance to reflect reduced capacity utilization at Malaysian and Vietnamese facilities. However, the complaint alleges that defendants characterized the idling as "temporary" and as preserving "optionality" without disclosing that these facilities could remain substantially idle into 2026. The second quarter 10-Q, filed July 31, 2025, incorporated newly negotiated tariff rates of 25% for Malaysia and 20% for Vietnam and discussed the possibility of "additional curtailments, including the potential temporary idling of production," but again allegedly failed to convey the likely duration and severity of underutilization heading into the next fiscal year. The third quarter 10-Q, filed October 30, 2025, introduced the new U.S. finishing facility but explicitly excluded "any additional costs associated with potential restructuring charges or asset impairments" from guidance, which the complaint alleges failed to disclose the full financial impact of the Southeast Asian underutilization and potential idling. The complaint invokes Item 105 of SEC Regulation S-K, which requires companies to disclose material risk factors that make an investment "speculative or risky" and to "concisely explain how each risk affects" the company. According to the complaint, First Solar's risk factor disclosures throughout the class period failed to convey the scope and severity of the tariff risk to the company's business and the extent to which the deliberate underutilization of international facilities and production relocation to the U.S. risked materially impairing projected 2026 performance. The overall pattern, as alleged, was one of framing known, materializing operational headwinds in conditional, forward-looking language, treating ongoing disruptions as manageable uncertainties rather than disclosing their probable impact on the company's near-term financial trajectory.

How to Check Eligibility in the First Solar (FSLR) Class Action

• Confirm you purchased FSLR shares during the February 26, 2025 to February 24, 2026 class period
• Review the allegations and eligibility requirements in the pending securities class action
• Gather trade confirmations and brokerage records documenting purchases or losses
• Consult counsel regarding the lead plaintiff deadline, eligibility, and any potential rights in the litigation

Disclaimer: Attorney Advertising. This shareholder alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for personalized guidance. No specific outcomes are guaranteed.